Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:19:44 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#990991: nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #990991,
regarding nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
990991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid
environment."
The maintainer-uploaded amd64 binaries have dependencies on packages in
experimental.
libatlas-ecmwf-0 is M-A: same, therefore ANY instead of only amd64.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-07-12 14:57:08 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid
> environment."
>
> The maintainer-uploaded amd64 binaries have dependencies on packages in
> experimental.
> libatlas-ecmwf-0 is M-A: same, therefore ANY instead of only amd64.
Scheduled. But that't wont make atlas-ecmwf migrate if that's what
you're after.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
