Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:52:26 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#993394: transition: glibc 2.32
has caused the Debian Bug report #993394,
regarding transition: glibc 2.32
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
993394: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Dear release team,
I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.32. It has been built
successfully on all release architectures except mips*el, however I have
successfully built them manually on eller.d.o. It also builds fine on most
ports architectures.
As glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
rebuilt for this transition:
- apitrace
- dante
- gcc-9 (s390x only)
- libnih
- libnss-db
- unscd
- zeek
Here is the corresponding ben file:
title = "glibc";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</;
is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.33\)/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.32\)/;
In addition a few new symbols have been added that might prevent a few
other packages to migrate to testing until glibc migrates if they pick
up the new symbols, however those are really limited in this version.
Thanks for considering.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-09-05 23:40:59 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 2021-09-05 19:15, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.32.html
> >
> > On 2021-09-02 22:11:50 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2021-08-31 20:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: [email protected]
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Dear release team,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.32. It has been built
> > > > successfully on all release architectures except mips*el, however I have
> > > > successfully built them manually on eller.d.o. It also builds fine on
> > > > most
> > > > ports architectures.
> > >
> > > It has been finally built on mipsel and mips64el, successfully.
> >
> > Please go ahead.
>
> Thanks, I have just uploaded it.
glibc migrated. Closing.
Cheers
>
> Cheers,
> Aurelien
>
> --
> Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
> [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
