Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:05:29 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1004915: transition: ruby2.7-rm
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004915,
regarding transition: ruby2.7-rm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1004915: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:[email protected]
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We would like to add ruby3.0 as the default and remove ruby2.7 support.
Ben file:
title = "ruby2.7-rm";
is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7/ | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~
/^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/;
is_good = ! .depends ~ /ruby2.7/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/;
This part of the transition was already done in Ubuntu, so I do not expect
any blocker, this is the transition tracker page there:
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ruby2.7-rm.html
ruby-defaults/1:3.0~exp1 is already in experimental (which makes ruby3.0 the
default and remove ruby2.7), I'll be waiting for your acknowledgement to
upload it to unstable.
--
Lucas Kanashiro
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On 16-03-2022 22:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 16-03-2022 22:18, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
The problem is that it did not migrated yet, some regressions were
reported.
If you mean autopkgtest regressions found by ci, than those should be
dealt with now.
And ruby2.7 was removed from testing. This transition is done.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
