On 2022-03-18 13:06:13, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:51 PM Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, i...@packages.debian.org > > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html > > Tags: moreinfo > > > > icu has a new upstream version in experimental (#1006960). Is there a > > plan to get it into unstable and then testing?
>From the RT side of view, I'm not aware of any plans. > > The reason I'm asking is that GNOME 42 will need an updated gjs, which > > needs mozjs91, which needs either icu 70 or rebuilding to use its vendored > > copy of icu. > > > > > FYI same here, i had to fallback to nodejs 14 instead of 16 because of that. > Last time I asked, icu maintainer had issues fixing icu reverse > build-dependencies. > He probably needs help ? Have those bugs already been filed? Otherwise, filing bugs for the reverse dependencies that FTBFS would be a good first step. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
