On 2022-03-21 22:11:17 [+0100], Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Specifically, we were hoping to better understand the risk of openssl > changes breaking existing setups. It's possible the issues with gnutls > and libnet-ssleay-perl tests were narrowly scoped enough that that risk > is low, but we're just not sure right now. Other input would be > welcome.
No matter how it turns out, I'm fine with it. It would be nice in in case of postponing it, to keep in pu for the following point release so that it receives more test coverage. [Unless of course if this means that the pu is canceled.] > Thanks, > Julien Sebastian
