On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 19:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 05-06-2022 19:35, M. Zhou wrote: > > > But if this is really the result of the rebuild. I think we just > > > discovered a serious flaw. The alternative dependency on libluajit-5.1-2 > > > just lost its version constraint, as it's only added to libluajit2-5.1-2. > > > > Ummmm... Yes, that's a good catch. > > > > I fixed this versioned dependency issue with the following commit: > > https://salsa.debian.org/lua-team/luajit/-/commit/561f846d9c84587ffff6715eef086aeb9ff0fd80 > > (pending to upload to unstable upon transition approval) > > Ha, but because libluajit2-5.1-2 is new, it doesn't require a version > AFAICT.
Technically yes. And the first version of src:luajit2 is greater than that number. But logically luajit2 (<= 2.1~) may be really missing symbols based on the src:luajit symbol control file tracking record. So either way works for us. Let's go ahead with it.
