Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:27:13 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1010553: Providing information on the result of the
transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010553,
regarding transition: dlib
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1010553: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010553
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear Release team,
I would like to request a transition slot for dlib, which has been accepted in
experimental and builds well inside. I changed the name of the binary lib
package after an ABI breakage.
The automatic ben file at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-dlib.html
looks good.
Three reverse dependencies:
- seer
- plastimatch
- openturns
All of them build fine against the new package, so binNMU will be enough for
the three of them.
Best regards,
--
Pierre
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-05-14 22:12:22 +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although the tracker page [0] indicates ``?!'' for all architectures of all
> involved packages except plastimatch, I inform you that everything went
> well: all builds succeeded.
> This is not true for plastimatch, but no big issue as a RM request (for
> unstable) has recently been filed for this package.
>
>
> Thanks for your help for the transition,
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
