Your message dated Wed, 6 Jul 2022 20:47:13 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1013977: transition: mujs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013977,
regarding transition: mujs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1013977: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mujs.html
mujs needs a transition. I have successfully rebuilt all reverse dependencies
listed in the auto tracker against the experimental version 1.2.0 without any
change.
This transition is needed to import a new mupdf upstream version.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-06-29 00:19:18 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2022-06-28 13:35:22 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mujs.html
> >
> > mujs needs a transition. I have successfully rebuilt all reverse
> > dependencies
> > listed in the auto tracker against the experimental version 1.2.0 without
> > any
> > change.
> >
> > This transition is needed to import a new mupdf upstream version.
>
> Please go ahead
mujs migrated and the old binaries got removed.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
