* Mattia Dongili ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070114 14:39]: > Hello, > > aba (Cc-ed) followed the issue. So basically -4 fixes some forced FTBFS > due to bugs in the iasl code generation and load/store unaligned > accesses (#406034 and #406558) as a followup to #401153. > > Now, is it worth trying to push for -4 in etch? the only package > build-depending on iasl is qemu which already includes workarounds so > maybe -4 can wait (and never appear as there's a new upstream release > available).
I don't consider -4 as "required for release", but of course adding more architectures that actually work is a good thing (and thanks to the testcase we'll notice if something goes wrong). So, in the end it's the maintainers decision, nothing special from the release team. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
