Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:07:31 +0200
with message-id <yybrwzpubphjc...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1019284: transition: linphone-stack
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019284,
regarding transition: linphone-stack
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1019284: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

I'm asking for permission for a small mostly self-contained transition
of the whole linphone stack. It has been staged in experimental.

Most of these libraries don't change SONAME, but upstream only supports staying
within the same minor version. So there is a (>= | < ) dependency generated
with shlibs and the stack will have to migrate in one go.

bctoolbox 4.4.13-4 -> 5.0.37-2
belr 4.4.13-2 -> 5.0.37-1
bzrtp 4.4.13-2 -> 5.0.37-1
lime NEW in unstable
bcmatroska2 NEW in unstable
ortp 1:4.4.13-2 -> 1:5.0.37-1
belcard 4.4.13-2 -> 5.0.37-1
belle-sip 4.4.21+dfsg-2 -> 5.0.37+dfsg-2
mediastreamer2 1:4.4.21 -> 1:5.0.37+dfsg-3
linphone 4.4.21-2 -> 5.0.37-4
linphone-desktop 4.2.5-3 -> 4.3.2-1

only ortp has reverse dependencies outside of the linphone stack that will need
a binNMU. They have been successfully built against the version in experimental.

bcg729
trx
libosmo-abis
libosmo-netif
osmo-bts

Bernhard

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-09-13 18:06:07 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > > only ortp has reverse dependencies outside of the linphone stack
> > > that will need >> a binNMU. They have been successfully built
> > > against the version in
> experimental.
> > > 
> > > bcg729
> > > trx
> > > libosmo-abis
> > > libosmo-netif
> > > osmo-bts
> > 
> > Please go ahead
> 
> All uploaded and built on all release architectures. As far as I can see,
> only libosmo-abis and trx need a binNMU.

Unless I missed something, everything should have migrated by now.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to