Hi Steinar, On 2022-11-23 09:27:32 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does > > not > > have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture list of the > > source package. (There is a ppc64el build in stable, for 2.0.1-3.) Do I need > > some sort of manual nudging here? > > Nevermind, it seems it was still stuck in the architecture list of one of the > subpackages further down!
After fixing the architecture list of the package, it will also need to be removed by FTP masters from unstable. Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org to get futatabi's ppc64el binary removed. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
