Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2022 08:06:50 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#995636: transition: openssl
has caused the Debian Bug report #995636,
regarding transition: openssl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
995636: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995636
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Hi,
We would like to transition to OpenSSL 3.0.0. It's currently in
experimental. It has an soname change, so the binary packages got
renamed and binNMUs will be required.
We did a rebuild of packages and currently have 105 packages
that FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0.0 that build with 1.1.1. I've started
filing bugs for that:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected]&tag=ftbfs-3.0
Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-10-03 14:59:31 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> We would like to transition to OpenSSL 3.0.0. It's currently in
> experimental. It has an soname change, so the binary packages got
> renamed and binNMUs will be required.
>
> We did a rebuild of packages and currently have 105 packages
> that FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0.0 that build with 1.1.1. I've started
> filing bugs for that:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected]&tag=ftbfs-3.0
With cargo fixed, the old binaries got finally removed from testing.
Closing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
