Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:17:55 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1005128: nmu: hugin_2021.0~beta1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005128,
regarding nmu: hugin_2021.0~beta1+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1005128: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005128
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
nmu hugin_2021.0~beta1+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against libgsl27"
hugin is currently built against libgsl25 and therefore is
uninstallable in unstable.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-02-07 12:24:09 -0500, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, at 12:13 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > This is currently not possible. See #1003547
>
> Ah, thank you. I didn't find that bug because I was only looking at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=hugin, not at
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libvigraimpex, which is a
> library I have never heard of before. Sorry for the noise.
hugin was uploaded in the meantime.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
