Hello, On Thu 05 Jan 2023 at 01:13PM GMT, Simon McVittie wrote:
> 3. If the ftp team prioritize NEW review of unstable packages higher than > experimental packages (do they?) then that would be > counter-productive under the proposed policy, and they'd have to > stop doing that (and perhaps prioritize binary-NEW higher than > source-NEW, instead). experimental packages appear in red on > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, which makes me wonder whether > that reflects those packages being de-prioritized, but perhaps I'm > reading too much into that? The scripts prioritise binary-NEW over source-NEW by default, though I override this with a shell alias myself. We don't pay attention to unstable vs. experimental. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
