On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 21:35:41 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Simon McVittie, on 2023-03-03:
> > llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.7-1 was uploaded several weeks ago, shortly
> > after the transition freeze, but has not migrated to testing due to an
> > autopkgtest regression (#1029010).
>
> I subscribe the debian-ai mailing list. The ROCm compiler is
> currently built on top of llvm-toolchain-15, and moving back to
> the llvm-toolchain-14 may require some non-trivial effort if the
> latter were to not target Debian 12 bookworm.
There is *a* version of llvm-toolchain-15 in bookworm, version 1:15.0.6-4,
which is used by the rocm-hipamd_5.2.3-1 and mesa_22.3.3-1 in bookworm.
I'm not suggesting that 1:15.0.6-4 should be *removed*. What I'm asking
here is whether it's intended to be upgraded to 1:15.0.7-1 (or presumably
a later version where #1029010 has been fixed), or kept at 1:15.0.6-4.
It looks as though rocm-hipamd and mesa are in a very similar situation,
actually: each one has a newer version in unstable which fixes a RC bug
currently present in bookworm (#1021643 in rocm-hipamd, #1029731 in mesa)
but cannot migrate because it's blocked by llvm-toolchain-15_1:15.0.7-1
not migrating.
smcv
