Your message dated Thu, 27 Apr 2023 19:25:36 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1034899: unblock: sssd/2.8.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034899,
regarding unblock: sssd/2.8.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1034899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:sssd
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package sssd.
[ Reason ]
This drops a change that added a line for subid to /etc/nsswitch.conf,
but subuid only supports a single database, so this addition needs to be
dropped so that /etc/sub[ug]id still works.
[ Impact ]
Prevents sssd from getting dropped from bookworm.
[ Risks ]
Minimal, subuid support was a fairly recent addition, so people
upgrading from earlier Debian don't see sssd changing behaviour (due to
this).
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock sssd/2.8.2-4
--
tdiff -Nru sssd-2.8.2/debian/changelog sssd-2.8.2/debian/changelog
--- sssd-2.8.2/debian/changelog 2023-02-26 16:35:48.000000000 +0200
+++ sssd-2.8.2/debian/changelog 2023-04-11 15:19:36.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+sssd (2.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Sam Morris ]
+ * Don't add subid to /etc/nsswitch.conf (Closes: #1032990)
+
+ -- Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:19:36 +0300
+
sssd (2.8.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Gioele Barabucci ]
diff -Nru sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.nss sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.nss
--- sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.nss 2023-02-26 16:33:13.000000000 +0200
+++ sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.nss 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-# The 'subid' database supports only a sigle data source:
-# <https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/351>
-subid database-add
-
-subid last sss
diff -Nru sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.preinst
sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.preinst
--- sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.preinst 2023-01-10 16:39:57.000000000
+0200
+++ sssd-2.8.2/debian/sssd-common.preinst 2023-04-11 15:14:22.000000000
+0300
@@ -17,6 +17,14 @@
# Force the AppArmor profile to complain mode on install
inst_complain_profile
;;
+upgrade)
+ if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le 2.8.2-3; then
+ # 2.8.2-2 added a line for subid which was premature given that
+ # libsubid supports only a single database. Let's remove it to avoid
+ # breaking systems where the user expects /etc/sub[ug]id to continue to
+ # work.
+ sed -E -i "${DPKG_ROOT}/etc/nsswitch.conf" -e '/^subid:\s*sss\s*$/d'
+ fi
esac
#DEBHELPER#
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Timo,
On 27-04-2023 08:14, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
unblock sssd/2.8.2-4
"""
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ Too young, only 16 of 20 days old
Additional info:
∙ ∙ Updating sssd will fix bugs in testing: #1032990
∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/s/sssd.html
∙ ∙ autopkgtest for sssd/2.8.2-4: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Pass,
armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass
∙ ∙ not blocked: has successful autopkgtest
"""
sssd isn't blocked, so nothing to do.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
