On 7/25/23 14:29, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 7/25/23 09:39, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 7/9/23 18:03, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
Unfortunately, qtwebengine FTBFS on mipsel again. We are working on it
together with Adrian Bunk (huge thanks to him for that).
There are RM bugreports for qtwebengine-opensource-src and some of its
rdeps, but more are required to unblock the removal.
I went over the rdep tree with `dak rm -Rn -a mipsel` on coccia to get
an idea of what other packages need to be dealt with:
Packages that used qtwebengine-opensource-src only on architectures
where it's available have patches to remove mipsel from the architecture
list.
All rdeps that prevent the removal of qtwebengine-opensource-src from
mipsel also have RM bugs.
I think we're good once all the issues in the list have been dealt with.
Now that qtwebengine-opensource-src has been built on mipsel after all,
should we close the RM bugreports for the partial removal from mipsel of
the rdeps?
Or will the next upload of qtwebengine-opensource-src remove the mipsel
from its list of architectures?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
