On 2023-10-22 13:43:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2023-10-22 at 14:37 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2023-10-22 13:20:43 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > It is just me, or lots of packages that were autoremoved > > > from testing have propagated to testing again this night? > > > > > > Example: "broker" has #1037597, however: > > > > > > $ rmadison broker > > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | oldstable | source > > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | stable | source > > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | testing | source > > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | unstable | source > > > broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | unstable-debug | source > > > > Don't know yet why this happened. For that run, broker was marked as > > BLOCKED but was still tried. > > Depending on exactly which run, at a guess this is related to: > > adsb@buxtehude:~$ ls -ltr /srv/bugs.debian.org/bugscan/stati | tail -n10 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 716663 Oct 22 02:52 status-202310220250 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 9865 Oct 22 03:50 status-202310220350 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715452 Oct 22 04:50 status-202310220450 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715452 Oct 22 05:50 status-202310220550 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715452 Oct 22 06:50 status-202310220650 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 715823 Oct 22 07:51 status-202310220750 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 716262 Oct 22 08:51 status-202310220850 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 718794 Oct 22 09:52 status-202310220950 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 717317 Oct 22 10:50 status-202310221050 > -rw-r--r-- 1 debbugs debbugs 717694 Oct 22 11:51 status-202310221150 > > The small file from 03:50 only seems to contain bugs relating to > pseudo-packages, based on a quick visual scan.
That would fit the time. b1/britney only checks for empty files. Adding owner to the loop: Don, any idea what caused the RC bugs export to miss all the non-pseudo package RC bugs? Would it be possible to fail the export in such a case instead of providing partial RC bug data? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
