Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:02:56 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Released with 11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056123,
regarding bullseye-pu: package conda-package-handling/1.7.2-2+deb11u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1056123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: [email protected]
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:conda-package-handling
[ Reason ]
This upload fixes Bug #976506: FTBFS due to flaky test.
Upstream added a time condition to skip the failing test,
but that just moved the problem to a future which has already arrived.
This upload removes the condition and skip the test without conditions,
as it was done already in unstable.
[ Impact ]
Anybody trying to build the package from source may get the error:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/amd64/conda-package-handling.html
[ Tests ]
There are no code changes. I've verified that the package
now builds from source.
[ Risks ]
Very low. No code changes. Patch is trivial.
[ Checklist ]
[X] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
[X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[X] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
[X] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
[ Changes ]
The attached patch is in git diff format, which is
a little bit clearer than debdiff because the existing
patch has been renamed.
[ Other info ]
The package is already uploaded.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 306c900..c06fada 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+conda-package-handling (1.7.2-2+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Disable flaky test. Closes: #976506.
+
+ -- Santiago Vila <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:30:00 +0100
+
conda-package-handling (1.7.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 3d1dca5..b36fda0 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
fix_linking.patch
fix_test.patch
fix-out-dir.patch
-extend-test-datetime-to-dec-2021.patch
+skip-test-timeline.patch
diff --git a/debian/patches/extend-test-datetime-to-dec-2021.patch
b/debian/patches/skip-test-timeline.patch
similarity index 71%
rename from debian/patches/extend-test-datetime-to-dec-2021.patch
rename to debian/patches/skip-test-timeline.patch
index 4b22288..78aee74 100644
--- a/debian/patches/extend-test-datetime-to-dec-2021.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/skip-test-timeline.patch
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
-Description: Extend datetime to Dec 1, 2021 in
test_secure_refusal_to_extract_abs_paths to prevent failing tests in arm64.
+Description: Stop extending datetime in
test_secure_refusal_to_extract_abs_paths to prevent failing tests in arm64.
Upstream has confirmed this here:
https://github.com/conda/conda-package-handling/issues/74#issuecomment-739349646
Author: Nilesh Patra <[email protected]>
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=976506
Forwarded: https://github.com/conda/conda-package-handling/pull/75
-Last-Update: 2020-12-06
+Last-Update: 2023-11-17
+
--- a/tests/test_api.py
+++ b/tests/test_api.py
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
@@ -11,7 +12,7 @@ Last-Update: 2020-12-06
[email protected](datetime.now() <= datetime(2020, 12, 1), reason="Don't
understand why this doesn't behave. Punt.")
[email protected](datetime.now() <= datetime(2021, 12, 1), reason="Don't
understand why this doesn't behave. Punt.")
[email protected](reason="Don't understand why this doesn't behave. Punt.")
def test_secure_refusal_to_extract_abs_paths(testing_workdir):
with tarfile.open('pinkie.tar.bz2', 'w:bz2') as tf:
open('thebrain', 'w').close()
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 11.9
The upload requested in this bug has been released as part of 11.9.
--- End Message ---
