Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:09:02 +0100 with message-id <zgk63k8xqseg2...@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1067749: nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1067749, regarding nmu: ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1067749: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067749 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ffm...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ffmpeg User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Manual (bootstrap?) builds of ffmpeg on armel, armhf seem to have been done with libglib2.0-0, which is depended on by at least libavcodec-extra60. nmu ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against libglib2.0-0t64" Thanks, smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 2024-03-26 10:39:03 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: ffm...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:ffmpeg > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > Manual (bootstrap?) builds of ffmpeg on armel, armhf seem to have been done > with libglib2.0-0, which is depended on by at least libavcodec-extra60. It was an upload with the pkg.ffmpeg.stage1 and pkg.ffmpeg.noextra build profiles. > nmu ffmpeg_7:6.1.1-3 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "rebuild against > libglib2.0-0t64" Scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
