Your message dated Fri, 29 Mar 2024 09:05:43 +0100
with message-id <zgz2v2e4uhtzh...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067891: nmu: memcached_1.6.23-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067891,
regarding nmu: memcached_1.6.23-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1067891: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: memcac...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:memcached
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu memcached_1.6.23-1 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-03-28 23:24:25 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 04:12:19PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2024-03-28 13:46:14 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: memcac...@packages.debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:memcached
> > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: binnmu
> > >
> > > nmu memcached_1.6.23-1 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
> >
> > Scheduled
>
> Argh, I got the version wrong, sorry. My fault for trusting reportbug
> while running testing ...
>
> nmu memcached_1.6.24-1 . armel armhf . unstable . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
Now scheduled with the correct version.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
