Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:14:56 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1071065: transition: libsecp256k1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071065,
regarding transition: libsecp256k1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1071065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: affects -1 + src:libsecp256k1
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsecp256k1.html
Hi,
I request a transition slot from libsecp256k1-1 to libsecp256k1-2.
The auto-generated tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies in sid build with
the experimental libsecp256k1.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-13 20:24:53 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2024-05-13 19:59:30 +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> > Control: affects -1 + src:libsecp256k1
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsecp256k1.html
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I request a transition slot from libsecp256k1-1 to libsecp256k1-2.
> > The auto-generated tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies in sid build
> > with the experimental libsecp256k1.
>
> Please go ahead
The old binaroes got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
