On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 18:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 12:14 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > after upload of libvncserver: 0.9.13+dfsg-2+deb11u1 our users > > spotted > > a > > regression in performance of x11vnc. The solutions for the > > reporting users were: > > > > (1) downgrade to libvncserver 0.9.13+dfsg-2 > > (2) rebuild x11vnc against libvncserver 0.9.13+dfsg-2+deb11u1 > > > > Option (2) is IMHO the way to go, thus this binNMU request for > > x11vnc in Debian bullseye. > > > > The ABI-break patch in libvncserver is this: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/libvncserver/-/blob/debian/bullseye/updates/debian/patches/0003-rfb-increase-update-buf-size.patch > > Given that this is apparently an ABI break, and libvncserver has > several other reverse (build-)dependencies in stable, how confident > are you that x11vnc is the only affected package?
Ping on this, given that bullseye is now oldstable and about to have its final point release. Regards, Adam
