Hi, Le jeudi 15 août 2024 à 21:52 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > > On 13-08-2024 08:03, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Howevever, many of them are related to the fact that i386 > > and armhf are no longer native (ocaml 5 dropped support for native > > compilation on 32-bit architectures), hence the corresponding > > uninstallability or autopkgtest issues for coq-related packages are > > irrelevant. Is britney smart enough to cope with this? > > If the excuses report an autopkgtest failure, britney2 didn't do what > you were hoping. ocaml builds on all architectures, so how should I > understand your statement? Are these non-installability and > autopkgtest > issues all for source packages that build arch:all binaries? Than > that > needs a hint from our side. Do any of these source packages build > arch > specific binaries on those architectures that no longer work, than > those > need to be removed from unstable (reportbug ftp.debian.org). > > Maybe I don't understand what you meant exactly (sorry for not having > read the full backlog).
The OCaml compiler has two compilation modes: native and vm. The new version disabled the native mode on 32bits architectures. Some packages that were ok with the last version aren't anymore. Hope that makes things clearer, J.Puydt
