Your message dated Fri, 4 Oct 2024 23:34:18 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1082734: transition: rhash
has caused the Debian Bug report #1082734,
regarding transition: rhash
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1082734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Usertags: transition
librhash SONAME has been bumped due to breaking ABI changes - several
deprecated symbols have been removed.
I've tested building of all reverse dependencies (cmake, lgogdownloader,
libigloo) and found no problems.
The auto-generated Ben parameters [1] looks good:
Affected: .depends ~ /\b(librhash1|librhash0)\b/
Good: .depends ~ /\b(librhash1)\b/
Bad: .depends ~ /\b(librhash0)\b/
Thanks.
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-rhash.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-09-26 18:13:40 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-rhash.html
>
> On 2024-09-25 09:58:43 +0300, Aleksey Kravchenko wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > librhash SONAME has been bumped due to breaking ABI changes - several
> > deprecated symbols have been removed.
> >
> > I've tested building of all reverse dependencies (cmake, lgogdownloader,
> > libigloo) and found no problems.
>
> Please go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
