Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:13:19 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1094931: transition: onnxruntime
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094931,
regarding transition: onnxruntime
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1094931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:onnxruntime
Control: block -1 by 1094440
Dear Release Managers,
I would like to request a transition slot for onnxruntime,
which has its SOVERSION bumped from 1.19.2 to 1.20.1.
Since new onnxruntime requires newer xnnpack than in sid,
this transition should be started after #1094440 is finished
(at least after new xnnpack is uploaded to sid).
The auto-onnxruntime transition has a needless "python3-onnxruntime”
package (but certainly works). A precise Ben file would be:
title = “onnxruntime 1.20.1";
is_affected = .depends ~ /\blibonnxruntime(1\.20\.1|1\.19\.2)\b/;
is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libonnxruntime1\.20\.1)\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libonnxruntime1\.19\.2)\b/;
--
Thanks,
Shengqi Chen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 18/02/2025 14:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 18/02/2025 14:09, Shengqi Chen wrote:
Hi,
2025年2月2日 23:06，Shengqi Chen <[email protected]> 写道：
Hi,
2025年2月2日 10:57，Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> 写道：
onnxruntime failed to build on arm64. Please take a look:
That is #1094828. And it reproduces on both gcc-14/15.
We are trying to find some workaround, if not fixes.
I just realized my reply is wrong, #1094828 is pytorch-related.
We have, anyway, now fixed arm64 FTBFS in 1.20.1+dfsg-1~exp3.
I have confirmed that gst-plugins-bad1.0, the only build-rdep
of onnxruntime against 1.20.1, builds against this new version.
Go ahead.
This was done. Let's close the bug.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
