Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:05:41 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1100580: transition: tree-sitter
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100580,
regarding transition: tree-sitter
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1100580: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:tree-sitter
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
The tree-sitter 0.22.6 packages in unstable accidentally included an ABI
break. This was noticed via #1100171. I've backported upstream's change
to include the minor version in the SONAME (since they're following
semver and are still pre-1.0).
There are only two rdeps which are also in testing -- neovim and emacs.
There are no source changes needed to the rdeps, just binNMUs once the
new binary package is uploaded to unstable.
Ben file:
title = "tree-sitter";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0" | .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0.22";
is_good = .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0.22";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-03-16 16:17:39 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 08:42:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 2025-03-15 13:33:13 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: important
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:tree-sitter
> > > User: [email protected]
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > The tree-sitter 0.22.6 packages in unstable accidentally included an ABI
> > > break. This was noticed via #1100171. I've backported upstream's change
> > > to include the minor version in the SONAME (since they're following
> > > semver and are still pre-1.0).
> > >
> > > There are only two rdeps which are also in testing -- neovim and emacs.
> > >
> > > There are no source changes needed to the rdeps, just binNMUs once the
> > > new binary package is uploaded to unstable.
> >
> > Since the ABI change is already in unstable, please go ahead.
>
> Thanks. Done.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
