severity 413469 important severity 413685 important severity 413686 important thanks
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:19:21PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > > If it's your intent to orphan the package, then it seems to me that the > > "unsuitable in the maintainer's opinion" justification doesn't really apply > > anymore, does it? > To be honest, I no longer care if ion3 is shipped with etch or not. The > reason why I wanted the package to be removed from etch was mainly > because I don't think a package without an active maintainer should stay > in etch. Well, there are always a number of packages in exactly that state in a release; again, it doesn't seem to me that ion3 is special in that regard. Besides, it does seem like these packages stand a good chance of being adopted. Now if you think this package will be unsupportable security-wise over the course of the release cycle, that would certainly be a good reason to drop it from the release, no question. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
