On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:59:25AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Actually, with the maintainer's agreement, this consisted in the > > > removal of the debconf note.
> > Where did the maintainer agree to this? The only reply I see in the bug log > > of #316834 is a *disagreement* with you. > He agreed privately, sorry. Ok, good enough. > > You also acknowledged that the second template (arguably the more important > > one) belongs in NEWS.Debian, but your patch drops that template completely. > > Granted, that note was never being /displayed/, but I don't think it's > > correct to remove the text from the package completely when it could be left > > in place for reference or (better) put in a NEWS.Debian. > I can put it back in NEWS.Debian. I usually do so and apparently > neglected to do it here. Probably because, as you said, the text was > never being displayed. > If you feel that's better, I can re-upload with that text back in NEWS.Debian. Yes, please do. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
