On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:21:03PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 07:46:34PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Can ntp version 1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-2 be hinted into testing? It contains > > some important fixes I'd like to see migrate to testing. > > +ntp (1:4.2.2.p4+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low > > + [ Peter Eisentraut ] > + * Removed obsolete logcheck entry > > Perhaps obsolete, but then it didn't hurt anything either, so not a late > change that I'm happy with letting in. [...] > Could you comment on the logcheck change? Specifically, what is it that > makes this definitively obsolete, the fact that ntp will no longer generate > such 'recvbuf' messages?
The string is not present anymore in the source. However it is present in the version from stable in libntp/recvbuff.c. The whole function has been removed. > + * Improved formatting and fixed random whitespace in cron job > > Hmm, gratuitous diff to be reviewed :/ This is mostly whitespace changes. And an if [ $? = 0 ] replaced by if [ $? -eq 0 ], and the "then" placed on the same line as the if. Anyway, I'd be happy to remove those 2 changes if needed. Kurt > + [ Kurt Roeckx ] > + * Set a default restriction list for ipv6 too. (Closes: #411809) > > This change is understandable and I agree it should be let in. > > + * Stop using dhcp provided servers on release and stop. Thanks > + to Torne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #411200) > > A slight nervousness about a behavior change this late that could have side > effects, but the difference between release/stop and expire/fail is slight > enough that I won't object. > > + * Don't use the nomodify option for localhost. Modification > + is only allowed when authenticated, so having the nomodify > + option doesn't buy us anything. It just prevents the resolver > + slave process who does authenticate itself from properly working > + (Closes: #385334, #401847) > > Yes, this is ok. > > + * Make sure that we disable ntp-server for everybody. (Closes: #410383) > > Not relevant for etch release, the sarge version is already covered by the > existing version check. > > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]