Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 09:32:31AM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > The attached debdiff cherry-picks the Trixie/Sid update to remove the > mono-source binary package from Bookworm, thus getting rid of the > reported build failure.
Does/did the contents of the archive in mono-source differ substantially from the source pakage mono in Debian? Or to put it another way, why would a user install mono-source instead of just doing `apt source mono`? I ask because removal from stable will not remove the package from user systems, and it then be out of date if mono is updated in future. I'm just wondering if we can handle that any better. Please remove `moreinfo` if you reply. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected] Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
