On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:21AM +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com" wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:46:28PM +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com" 
> > wrote:
> >> sorry, that I opened another thread. I didn't see that Mark opened one.

> >> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt' wrote:
> >>> Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>> It is requested that smstools (3.0.2-4) be allowed into etch; debconf
> >>>> translations and bug fixes.
> >>> We are only allowing rc bug fixes in now, so this update
> >>> won't get into etch.

> >> Well, i understand this and this release *does* fix an rc bug.

> > According to the changelog, it does not.

> > Where is the RC bug report in the BTS for this, with the explanation of the
> > bug?

> See #403615. This bug should have been closed in version 3.0.2-3 which
> is not in testing because the script that has been added to solve the
> (imho) rc bug were errornous.

That bug is not RC.  It only pertains to upgrades from version 3.0-1, which
is not the version in sarge.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to