Hello, > On Aug 22, 2025, at 1:26 PM, Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2025-08-13 17:40:26 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On 13-08-2025 16:28, Simon McVittie wrote: >>> Now that forky is open, would it be possible to start removing armel >>> from the lists of architectures that "matter"? >> >> >> We're intending to remove armel from testing soon. I seem to recall there >> was a reason why we might want to keep it longer during the cycle, but I >> can't recollect the reason and I can't seem to find it in my inbox (might >> have been on IRC or IRL. If nobody can reproduce the reason, we'll probably >> act within a couple of days/weeks. It already came up on IRC this week. > > I intend to merge > https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/tree/armel-removal by > the end of August and will then ask FTP to remove armel from forky.
Could we add loong64 while we’re at it? Adrian
