On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Well, that package is quite OK and surely with minimal changes.
I can upload tonight if finally my ADSL link is working. > What I would greatly prefer, however, is for the 2.2.7-2 version to go > in. I know it is a new upstream version, but it fixes dozens of bugs not > yet reported, and since no package at all depends on pound I cannot see > any harm done. Regression is also impossible, since 2.0-1.1 is so badly > broken. Me too; I am personally going to use/am using pound 2.2.7 from unstable in my production servers, but if 2.2.7 is unacceptable for etch, I think at the very least, we need to fix those two bugs in etch. Release team, is there *any* chance of letting the unstable version in? In my experience, it'd be a lot better than the NMU, but I would understand not going this route on April 3rd. Thanks, Jordi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
