On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 2:03 PM Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 18-08-2025 14:13, Simon McVittie wrote: > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0 says, among other > > things: > > > >> Rejected due to piuparts regression - > >> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/glib2.0.html > > > > But https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/g/glib2.0.html says that all > > binary packages were successfully tested, except for the udeb (which as > > far as I know is excluded from piuparts testing). > > > > https://piuparts.debian.org/testing2sid/source/g/glib2.0.html also looks > > good. > > > > Is this a problem with the migration machinery, or is there something > > I'm not seeing that needs to be addressed in glib2.0? > > > Last time we had something like this (bug #1102538) was when we had > older/cruft versions still around in unstable (I think that's a > (unfiled?) piuparts bug) that olasd has on his radar.
glib2.0 appears to be stuck again: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0 Thank you, Jeremy Bícha
