Your message dated Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:02:08 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #1123577,
regarding nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1123577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1123577
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:mesa
User: [email protected]
Usertags: arm64 armhf
User: [email protected]
Usertags: i386
User: [email protected]
Usertags: ppc64el
User: [email protected]
Usertags: riscv64
User: [email protected]
Usertags: s390x
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
mesa was binNMU'd as +b3 on amd64 but +b2 on all the other release
architectures, resulting in multiarch skew that makes packages like Wine
and Steam uninstallable. Anyone doing cross-compiling will probably want
the non-x86 architectures to be co-installable, too. I think this is
right:
nmu mesa_25.2.8-2 . ANY -amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild to sync binNMU versions"
but if there's a syntax for explicitly requesting +b3, that would be
safer.
-ports, if someone can trigger a +b3 build on the ports that are keeping
up, that would probably also be helpful:
hppa loong64 m68k powerpc sh4 sparc64 x32
(alpha and hurd-* are BD-Uninstallable, and ppc64 FTBFS, so not much
point for those)
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-12-31 10:37:50 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
>
> It seems the mismatch is still there:
>
>
>
> apt-cache show libgbm1:i386/testing
> Package: libgbm1
> Source: mesa (25.2.8-2)
> Version: 25.2.8-2+b2
>
> apt-cache show libgbm1/testing
> Package: libgbm1
> Source: mesa (25.2.8-2)
> Version: 25.2.8-2+b3
mesa is waiting to migrate. Closing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
