Your message dated Fri, 2 Jan 2026 10:48:13 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1122220: transition: openturns
has caused the Debian Bug report #1122220,
regarding transition: openturns
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1122220: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1122220
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:openturns
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Release team,
I would like to request a transition slot for openturns, which has API-breaking
changes in its last upstream version. The new openturns package has been
accepted in experimental and builds well on relevant architectures.
There is only one affected package: persalys, which I also maintain. The
version in unstable FTBFS against new openturns (I filled a bug) and I have
just uploaded to experimental the last version of persalys, which builds fine
against new openturns.
The auto-generated ben file at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openturns.html
is good.
Thanks a lot for your help,
- --
Pierre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Ow+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-12-09 07:02:02 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2025-12-08 23:21:50 +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
> > Control: affects -1 + src:openturns
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear Release team,
> >
> > I would like to request a transition slot for openturns, which has
> > API-breaking
> > changes in its last upstream version. The new openturns package has been
> > accepted in experimental and builds well on relevant architectures.
> >
> > There is only one affected package: persalys, which I also maintain. The
> > version in unstable FTBFS against new openturns (I filled a bug) and I have
> > just uploaded to experimental the last version of persalys, which builds
> > fine
> > against new openturns.
>
> Go ahead.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
