Hi Timo On 2026-01-13 10:24:53 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > it's been quite a while, and people have started to lower the severity of > the CMake 4 bugs again because of the long delay. Can we please go ahead > with the CMake 4 upload?
Indeed, I have raised the bugs back to serious. Please go ahead with the upload of cmake 4 to unstable. Cheers > > Cheers > Timo > > * Timo Röhling <[email protected]> [2025-12-03 15:11]: > > Hi Emilio, > > > > * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> [2025-12-03 13:29]: > > > The llvm bugs worry me a little bit. Other than that, this would be > > > good to go. > > I have looked into the issue and shared my findings [1]. If the bug is > > not as easy to resolve as I currently think it is, I also offered to > > upload a cmake-3 legacy package as a temporary band-aid, but I have not > > heard back from the LLVM maintainers yet. > > > > > > Cheers > > Timo > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1113237#35 > > > > The root cause is the support for WebAssembly targets. WebAssembly does > > not support shared libraries; older CMake releases just issued a warning > > and built static libraries instead, but this is no longer the case. LLVM > > upstream said the shared library build for runtime libs is not the > > default, so this must have been enabled somewhere in the Debian > > packaging. I could not figure out where, but I would assume the actual > > maintainers can. > > > > -- > > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ > > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ > > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ > > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ > > > > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯ -- Sebastian Ramacher
