Your message dated Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:37:49 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1126082: unblock: inetutils/2:2.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1126082,
regarding unblock: inetutils/2:2.7-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1126082: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1126082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:inetutils
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please increase the urgency (or reduce the age) for package inetutils.
[ Used "unblock" from reportbug, as the closest thing, but perhaps this
is not the correct thing to use, could not find documentation about
this, sorry. ]
[ Reason ]
The version in sid contains a remote authentication bypass fix for
telnetd, which gives root. When preparing the update, I had in mind
setting the urgency to high, but then forgot. :/
[ Other info ]
I thought about uploading a new version, but that would mean more
added time for other things (like CI) to catch up, etc. So I think a
hint might be better? (But happy to reupload if you think that'd be
better, then I can also add the bug closure and the CVE ref, which I
was thinking about retroactively fixing in the next upload.)
urgent inetutils/2:2.7-2
or
age-days 2 inetutils/2:2.7-2
(Not sure which one is more correct? :)
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
On Wed, 2026-01-21 at 19:26:40 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 05:22:15PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >...
> > [ Reason ]
> >
> > The version in sid contains a remote authentication bypass fix for
> > telnetd, which gives root. When preparing the update, I had in mind
> > setting the urgency to high, but then forgot. :/
> >...
>
> Not a member of the release team, just a note:
>
> urgency=high would not have made a difference here, since that's 2 days
> just like urgency=medium + passing its own autopkgtests on all
> architectures,[1]
> in both cases the result is an expected migration tomorrow evening.
>
> urgency=critical (or the synonymous urgency=emergency) would have given
> a delay of 0 days, only waiting for tests.
> [1] passing autopkgtests give a 3 day bonus, but not below a minimum of 2 days
Ah, sorry, right, had completely forgotten about the reduced delays
implemented some time ago :/. I think a migration tomorrow (or
whenever autopkgtests are done and passing) is fine, sorry for the
noise, closing this now.
Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
