Your message dated Sat, 28 Feb 2026 22:47:17 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1126011: transition: hypre
has caused the Debian Bug report #1126011,
regarding transition: hypre
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1126011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1126011
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:hypre
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
I think we're ready to transition to hypre 3.0.0.
mfem has been updated for it and petsc is ready.
I've confirmed mfem and sundials (and petsc) build successfully.
Ben file:
title = "hypre";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libhypre-2.33.0" | .depends ~ "libhypre-3.0.0";
is_good = .depends ~ "libhypre-3.0.0";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libhypre-2.33.0";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2026-01-20 20:54:06 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2026-01-20 12:53, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the quick look. That sounds fine; please go ahead with the
> > upload to unstable.
>
> Uploaded, but awkward, I didn't peer closely enough at arm64. Test
> tolerances are getting missed in many cases. Seems to be otherwise running
> essentially correctly.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
