Hi,I'm contacting you because over the last year I sporadically experienced migration of a package from unstable to testing that I didn't expect because it was affected by an RC bug at that time. To enable us to troubleshoot the issue, I've been collecting all the rc bugs exports that brintey2 used.
On 26 February, it happened again. src:python-nss migrated despite bug 1080757 [1]. When I grep through the rc bugs export for that bug number, it's missing from the 21:50 export (.22 below, used in the 22:00 run of britney, which happens to be a migration run), but present in the list from 20:50 (.21) and 22:50 (.23). Inspecting the public bug report [1] I'm not seeing activity at that time that could explain this behavior. Also the lists seem otherwise very similar, only one additional bug appeared between the 20:50 and 21:50 export, and the 21:50 export isn't truncated or something like that.
elbrus@respighi:~/britney-debci-history$ xzgrep -l 1080757 rc-*-2026-02-26.2*
rc-unstable-2026-02-26.20.txt.xz rc-unstable-2026-02-26.21.txt.xz rc-unstable-2026-02-26.23.txt.xz Do you have any idea what's going on? PaulPS: While checking I also noticed that in the 23:00 list, bug 1116227 is missing.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1080757
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
