Your message dated Sun, 1 Mar 2026 18:58:50 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1124765: transition: adios2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1124765,
regarding transition: adios2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1124765: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1124765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:adios2
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
adios2 2.11 has been built in experimental
and is ready for transition from 2.10.
nanobind has been waiting longer (#1123044) so it should go first.
The auto tracking page is
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-adios2.html
Ben file:
title = "adios2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libadios2-mpi-c-2.10" | .depends ~
"libadios2-mpi-c-2.11";
is_good = .depends ~ "libadios2-mpi-c-2.11";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libadios2-mpi-c-2.10";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2026-01-12 20:13:31 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2026-01-12 19:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Thanks. If the rdeps build fine, then go ahead.
>
> Thanks Emilio, I've uploaded to unstable.
>
> I've confirmed dolfinx finds and builds against the adios2 2.11 packages.
>
> paraview has other problems and needs separate attention, so won't be
> blocking transition.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
