Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 14:05:30 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> No, you don't seem to understand that I'm saying that having these
>> bits out of sync at release time is *unacceptable*.
>
> OK. I am not going to argue about this. Perhaps you know some
> technical reasons why it is unacceptable to have these out of sync.
> These reasons however are far from obvious to me. :-)
It's a hell to manage. Think about a bug that exists on the new
version of .deb and not the old, used o .udeb or the inverse. You'd
possible need to upload a old package to update the udeb and DAK would
forbit it.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
