On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 07:30:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'd like to do a sourceful (i.e. non-binary-only) NMU of rlwrap for > etch r1, so that the package gets rebuilt on all architectures. > Queing binary NMUs is apparently not enough to fix this issue.
Why not? Were binNMUs of rlwrap requested? I don't see that there are currently rlwrap binNMUs scheduled for stable, nor do I find a request for such in my inbox. > Would that be acceptable? >From a release-management perspective I don't see any reason that a sourceful upload wouldn't be allowed if the only change is a rebuild and a rebuild is needed, but I don't see any explanation of why a rebuild is needed in the first place. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
