On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:22:37PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:13:50PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > that's the point of my question. The 2.6 kernel in etch do not depends > > upon a 2.5 libc. the ones in unstable do. So in order to upgrade the > > libc to upstable one, you _have_ to install an etch 2.6.18 first. > > > > I'm asking what we can do to ensure people don't get to the point > > where they don't know how to break that chicken and egg issue like in > > #428655. > > > > IMHO we should have some kind of warning in etch ASAP, but I'd be glad > > to have the opinions of the RMs and SRMs on this. > > IANASRM, but IMHO, it would be too late to do this in a point release. > Why not a preinst script in libc 2.5 to disallow upgrade if the running > kernel is 2.4, as well as adding conflicts on etch libc to kernel packages ?
libc6 preinst already aborts if the running kernel is a 2.4 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
