Hi,
On 2026-06-05 20:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A small status update.
>
> On 2026-04-28 18:47, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2026-04-28 10:22, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On 2025-12-29 13:12:48 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Linux 6.19 will drop support for 31-bit compatibility on s390x, and
> > > > will
> > > > also stop providing 31-bit support in UAPI header files [1]. Once this
> > > > lands in unstable, it will become impossible to build the libc6-s390
> > > > and
> > > > libc6-dev-s390 packages on s390x. We should therefore stop building
> > > > these packages, as well as g++-15-multilib and the corresponding lib32*
> > > > libraries.
> > > >
> > > > Doing so will break many packages. I therefore suggest that, over the
> > > > next few weeks, we start removing 31-bit support in all packages except
> > > > src:gcc-15, src:gcc-defaults, src:glibc, src:linux and src:zlib (and
> > > > possibly the corresponding cross compilers?). Then in a final
> > > > coordinated step, we can fully drop 31-bit support from those remaining
> > > > packages as well.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts about that? Volunteers to coordinate this?
> > >
> > > If I am reading dak output correctly, we are down to gcc-11, gcc-13,
> > > gcc-14, gcc-15, zlib, and glibc itself. So assuming that I didn't miss
> > > anything, are we there to also drop the support from these packages?
> >
> > These packages have already been fixed, but they are kept as cruft in
> > sid (but not in forky). I have not investigated why, it could just be
> > that dak is not smart enough.
>
> All the cross packages got removed. gcc-1[1-4] also got removed.
>
> > In addition llvm-toolchain-{14,19,20} are still waiting for a fix [1],
> > but they are only in sid or experimental.
>
> llvm-toolchain-14 is also gone, for all architectures.
>
> For dependencies, we are left with only gcc-15, gcc-defaults, zlib and
> glibc, I'll work on filling the corresponding bugs against
> ftp.debian.org as the next step.
This is now done. A bit thanks to Thorsten Alteholz for handling all the
removal request. This means we do not have 31-bit s390 binaries anymore
in testing or unstable \o/.
Release team members, I guess that with done, the "s390-31-bit-rm"
transition can be remove from the tracker.
> For build-dependencies, llvm-toolchain-{19,20} still need to be fixed.
This part still needs to be fixed but requires new sourceful uploads.
There are RC bugs (#1125251 and #1125252) for tracking that.
In addition both llvm-toolchain-19 and llvm-toolchain-20 currently FTBFS
due to CMake 4 (#1113237 and #1139588). In addition llvm-toolchain-20 is
only kept in experimental to possibly help the removal of older
llvm-toolchain versions (see #1116216) if some packages can't switch to
llvm-toolchain-21.
I am therefore not planning to work on fixing these packages.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected] http://aurel32.net
