On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:35:46PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 05:13:57PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > > - Drop the SSL-less variant of the library, which was not present in curl > > > 7.15.5; AFAICS, there is no use case where a user of curl *needs* to > > > *not* > > > have SSL support, so this split seems to be unnecessary overhead. > > > Please > > > correct me if I'm mistaken.
> > I made this to allow thos not willing to install any SSL-related stuff > > but never checked it is really possible. IIRC I was even asked for it. > > Anyway I don't feel strong on it, if it as to go away it will. > Theoretically, there could be license issues if a GPL program wanted to > link with a libcurl version which links with OpenSSL - and OpenSSL is > incompatible with the GPL. And indeed, by having "libcurl4-dev" point to the gnutls variant, this is already addressed in the proposal. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
