Your message dated Sat, 27 Jun 2026 14:39:54 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1129526: transition: ocaml 5.4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1129526,
regarding transition: ocaml 5.4.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1129526: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1129526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Control: affects -1 + src:ocaml
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to request a transition slot for ocaml 5.4.1.
I've uploaded it to experimental, and it builds successfully on
all architectures so far:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml&suite=experimental
I recompiled the OCaml world with it:
http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-5.4.1/
At most 430 source packages are involved. A binNMU will suffice for
most of them.
Only 9 relevant packages are missing from this rebuild:
- llvm-toolchain-{14,18,19,21,22}: as usual, too big for my workflow...
- frama-c, ocaml-gavl, pplacer, sks: not in testing
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 17/06/2026 10:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 16/06/2026 12:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 11/06/2026 08:49, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 28/05/2026 à 08:00, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
We are still blocked on llvm-toolchain-19. See #1125251 and #1113237.
These are already fixed in git for weeks, the only missing part for
unlocking transitions blocked for months is a maintainer upload of
llvm-toolchain-19.
It would be appreciated if an LLVM maintainer could do that.
It's been 2 weeks now, and I saw no progress on this matter.
That got uploaded. It hasn't migrated yet, but I think we can start ocaml
already.
Please go ahead.
The "suggested binNMUs" link in [1] is broken, and I can't remember who is
running it now. Do you have an updated link?
Looks like nobody is running that anymore?
Anyway ocaml migrated, so this is done. Closing.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
