On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:20:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:53:03AM +0930, Ron wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:23:16PM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > > I would like to propose a new release goal: the removal of the outdated > > > wxwindows2.4 library. > > > I think proposing this as a release goal is a bit premature, since > > what you are really proposing is to drop a number of stable, mature > > applications. > > Worse, it appears that he's proposing to have the release team endorse > highly-intrusive source changes in 0-day NMUs in order to update these > applications to backwards-incompatible versions of wxwindows. > > IMHO this is not the sort of thing that should be listed as a release goal; > particularly when a fair number of the bugs at issue require a great deal of > individual attention, or have a "fix" that consists of packaging a new > upstream version.
After exchanging a few mails with Ron and reading Steve opinion, I fully
understand why this is a bad idea.
Let's forget about this proposal and my apologies for the noise...
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio .''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
