On Fri, Jul 24, 2026, at 6:35 PM, Andres Salomon wrote: > On 7/24/26 11:39, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026, at 7:04 PM, Andres Salomon wrote: >>> On 7/6/26 14:37, Andres Salomon wrote: >>>> >>>> > [...] >>> Okay, that took a little longer than expected because building chromium >>> on trixie with llvm-toolchain-22 broke (related to trixie's older >>> bindgen), but we have a workaround for chromium and I was able to test >>> chromium builds with this new ~deb13u2 package. >>> >>> I've attached the full debdiff between sid's version and this backport, >>> but the only non-changelog difference between ~deb13u1 and ~deb13u2 is >>> the bit at the end: > [...] >> >> it would probably be good if we could wait for this MR to land: >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/-/merge_requests/224 >> >> to avoid the need for another bump for rustc(-web)? > > > Ah jeez - if that were a smaller commit, I'd just cherry-pick it and > roll a ~deb13u3. Given the size though, I'll wait for the llvm packages > to pick it up and migrate to forky.
FWIW, the actual change is the first small hunk, the rest is testsuite changes that I don't think the Debian build even runs. Let me double-check and verify (and minimize accordingly). > Mike & Emilio, are you good with another 2-4 week delay for the llvm > backoprt? > > Also in the meantime, I'd appreciate testing of the current packages: > > https://people.debian.org/~dilinger/llvm22/ > > You can grab the orig from sid/forky if you want to rebuild, I'm on a > train right now and don't have very good wifi. I've only tested it > building chromium, so builds of firefox or rustc would help shake out > any additional changes we might need to make. I can give them a spin to build a dlstage0 backport of rustc 1.96 from experimental (the earlier versions are still on LLVM 21) over the weekend. Fabian
